Skip to main content

Investigation Quality Benchmark Overview

Generated: January 16, 2026 Models Analyzed: 5 Total Benchmark Runs: 79

1. Quality Rankings

Rankings based on average overall investigation score.

2. Cost Analysis


3. Performance Metrics


4. Evaluation Criteria Breakdown


5. Efficiency Analysis


6. Qualitative Analysis

gpt-5.2

Strengths

  • High quality investigation output
  • Thorough tool utilization
  • Strong in reasoning quality

Weaknesses

  • Inconsistent quality - high variance
  • High cost per investigation
  • Slow response time
  • Poor quality-to-cost ratio

gpt-4.1-nano

Strengths

  • High quality investigation output
  • Very cost-effective
  • Fast response time
  • Thorough tool utilization
  • Token-efficient reasoning
  • Excellent quality-to-cost ratio

Weaknesses

  • Weak in tool usage

gpt-4.1

Strengths

  • High quality investigation output
  • Thorough tool utilization

Weaknesses

  • Inconsistent quality - high variance
  • High cost per investigation
  • Verbose - uses many tokens for results
  • Poor quality-to-cost ratio
  • Weak in tool usage

gpt-4o-mini

Strengths

  • High quality investigation output
  • Very cost-effective
  • Thorough tool utilization
  • Excellent quality-to-cost ratio

Weaknesses

  • Inconsistent quality - high variance
  • Slow response time
  • Verbose - uses many tokens for results
  • Weak in tool usage

gpt-4o

Strengths

  • Token-efficient reasoning

Weaknesses

  • Inconsistent quality - high variance
  • Poor quality-to-cost ratio
  • Weak in tool usage

7. Recommendations

Primary Recommendation: gpt-4.1-nanoWeighted scoring: 40% quality, 30% cost-effectiveness, 20% reliability, 10% speed

Weighted Rankings

Use Case Specific Recommendations

Recommended Model: gpt-4.1-nanoBest balance of quality and cost for high volume usage.
Recommended Model: gpt-5.2Highest quality output for critical incident investigations.
Recommended Model: gpt-4.1-nanoLowest cost per investigation while maintaining acceptable quality.
Recommended Model: gpt-4.1-nanoFastest response time among high-quality models for time-sensitive alerts.

Quick Comparison Matrix